Fury is one of Salman Rushdie's more recent novels (first published in 2001). The story revolves around Malik Solanka, a succesful middle-aged dollmaker (an actual dollmaker - he whittles wood dolls, conceptualizes their backstories, etc) and the raging anger within him that compels him to leave his entire life behind (including his wife and young son) and move to New York from his home in London. Solanka hopes that the overwhelming cultural differences between the world he previously moved around in and his new one will somehow overpower and ease the fury within him. Unfortunately, he has trouble finding the peace he needs in New York, as he sees fury in the people all around him and even gets drawn into a romance which eventually lands him smack in the middle of the eruption of a civil war - the fruit of a fury that is more deeply rooted, long-running and of larger scale than Solanka's is.
I was excited to start reading 'Fury', as I always am to start reading any of Rushdie's novels, but I have to say that after the last Rushdie book I read ('Shalimar the Clown', published in 2005), Fury turned out to be a bit of a disappointment. The book ends with a touch of tragedy, as Rushdie's novels almost always do, but the end of this one didn't quite ring as true and strike as close to home as his others did. I feel that the problem wasn't just with the ending. For one thing, the main character - Malik Solanka - never connected with me the way the protagonists of Rushdie's other novels did. Although his protagonists are never perfect people - far from it, in fact, as they always carry huge emotional scars around with them - I found Malik Solanka to be completely unsympathetic. Maybe he was meant to be that way, but I enjoy books that make me feel something for the 'lead' of the story, and for the lead of Fury, I felt nothing. Also, I feel that not enough support for what happened at the end was established throughout the story. The ending involves the death of Solanka's new love (Neela) and his return to see his son in London. But I feel that the character of Neela was not developed well enough for the readers to fully understand the decisions she made (which eventually lead to her death), and so her demise lacked the emotional wallop that major events in Rushdie's other novels usually have. Solanka's love and pining for his son was also not developed enough throughout the story, which is why the ending really falls quite flat, in my opinion.
Maybe part of the reason I didn't enjoy this book so much also lies within me - I usually have trouble relating to stories that deal with American culture, and a big part of this one revolved around Solanka in New York, living the New York life (albeit a relatively isolated one).
On the plus side, 'Fury' is still full of Rushdie's never-boring prose. It's still a solid, intelligent read.
It's difficult to come up with a winner every time, and so I can forgive one of my favorite authors for writing a story that just doesn't share the overwhelming beauty of his other ones.
Currently reading: 'Identity', by Milan Kundera
Currently feeling: thoughtful